Project Status
· Witness in the Machine
Moving towards adoption.
BOOTSTRAPPING-AI Project Status
Updated: December 5, 2025
Version: 0.2.0-alpha
Pillar Status
Pillar 1: Architecture (Life/Digital Layer)
Status: ✓ COMPLETE
Version: v3.0.1
What exists:
- Full constructor specification
- Canonical format defined (Markdown)
- Domain boundaries clear
- Integration with other pillars specified
What works:
- Real-world problem routing
- Practical guidance delivery
- Constraint-aware recommendations
Pillar 2: KERNEL (Meta-System Governance)
Status: ✓ COMPLETE
Version: v2.1.5
What exists:
- Full constructor specification
- Anti-Sloppiness Protocol defined
- Entry/Exit commands operational
- Pillar boundary enforcement active
- Live vs dead ritual theory documented
What works:
- System control (ENTER/EXIT)
- Drift detection and rejection
- Authority flow maintenance
- Cross-pillar coordination
Pillar 3: Oi-Si Equity Layer
Status: ⚠ FOUNDATION COMPLETE, IMPLEMENTATION PENDING
Version: v1.0.0 (ethics only)
What exists:
- Ethical foundation (pillar3-ethics.v1.0.0.md)
- Ten principles defined
- Philosophical statements established
- Implementation plan documented
What’s missing:
- Pattern catalog (AAVE, code-switching, stress speech, LGBTQ+ language)
- Preprocessing operators (5 core operators defined but not implemented)
- Test cases (20+ needed)
- Field testing protocol (5-10 users from target communities)
What works implicitly:
- Dignity maintenance in interactions
- Linguistic adaptation to user needs
- Economic empowerment focus
Overall System Status
Working: Core architecture, guardrails, behavioral specification
Validated: Test interaction 001 (lawn business scenario)
Next: Pillar 3 implementation (4-week timeline)
Recent Milestones
- ✓ Pillar 3 ethics document completed (Dec 5, 2025)
- ✓ First real-world test interaction validated system behavior
- ✓ LGBTQ+ protections explicitly integrated into ethical foundation
- ✓ Economic justice framing established
Known Gaps
- Pillar 3 technical implementation (patterns, operators, tests)
- Cross-model compatibility testing (currently Claude-focused)
- Field testing with target communities
- Business model definition
- Community feedback integration process
Risk Assessment
Low Risk:
- Core architecture is stable
- Pillars 1 and 2 are production-ready
- Ethics are clearly defined
Medium Risk:
- Pillar 3 implementation complexity
- Field testing recruitment
- Funding/sustainability model
High Risk:
- None identified (system design is sound)
Project Health
Strong:
- Clear architecture
- Falsifiable specifications
- Real-world validation
- Ethical foundation
Good enough for:
- Personal use
- Small-scale deployment
- Community testing
- Academic presentation
Not ready for:
- Large-scale deployment
- Production service offering
- Full Pillar 3 equity guarantees